 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Rater, No. 6-099 / 05-0726,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, March 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a willful injury case, the trial judge did not need to recuse himself under Iowa Code Jud. Conduct 3(C)(1)(a) or Iowa Code § 602.1606(1) based on prior dealings with defendant when the judge was county attorney as there was no evidence of personal bias or prejudice.
|
|||||
| State v. Rowley, No. 6-021 / 05-0691,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, March 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not err in refusing to review the constitutional issues raised for the first time in appellant's motion for nunc pro tunc, filed more than 40 days after his initial petition requesting a restitution hearing, because under the Iowa Rules of Civil Procedure there was no way to consider the motion as an amendment to his petition.
|
|||||
| State v. Zhang, No. 6-088 / 05-0886,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, March 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not abuse its discretion by not granting defendant a deferred judgment following his conviction for indecent exposure, in violation of Iowa Code § 709.9 (2003), where it fully considered all of the relevant factors, balanced the factors, and felt that a deferred judgment would send an inappropriate message to defendant.
|
|||||
| US Bank, N.A. v. Chadima (In re Estate of Chadima), No. 6-013 / 05-0380,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, March 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a declaratory action filed by the estate's executor requesting the division of funds received by the deceased and her son to settle a lawsuit, the trial court's allocation of the settlement proceeds was proper as there was no evidence that the deceased made a completed gift of her share of the settlement proceeds to her son.
|
|||||
| Willenbring v. Roepcke, No. 6-112 / 05-1261,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, March 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Iowa Code § 598.41, court did not err in awarding joint legal custody and primary physical care of daughter to mother subject to reasonable visitation by father based on, mother's role as child's primary caretaker, mother's ability to better support child's relationship with father, and child's relationship with her older half-brother.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
