 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Smart, No. 6-058 / 04-1739,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, March 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, Iowa Code § 124.401, where defendant was the driver and owner of the car, he was nervous when stopped, the cocaine was found in the center console in plain view, and defendant had $ 1000 with him that was largely in small denominations.
|
|||||
| Stulz v. Stulz, No. 6-027 / 05-0910,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, March 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An order issuing protective order to a wife after finding that her husband committed domestic abuse, in violation of Iowa Code § 236.2 (2003), was upheld where the husband committed an assault, as defined by Iowa Code § 708.1. The husband was verbally abusive to his family and ripped the blinds off a glass door and threw them on the kitchen table.
|
|||||
| Terukina v. Gazelle Vill., Inc., No. 6-093 / 05-1109,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, March 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred in granting defendants' motion for directed verdict in employee's suit for breach of contract where there was question of fact as to whether parties had orally modified written employment contract; employee presented substantial evidence through his testimony that he had not agreed to wait to be paid until the employer received funding.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
