 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City of Johnston v. Christenson, No. 70 / 04-0208,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in awarding summary judgment to city in its action for a declaration that it was not obligated to approve a site plan for an accessory building on a property owner's land where a board of adjustment had decided that the proposed use was legal; board of adjustment's decision had preclusive effect and was binding on the trial court.
|
|||||
| In re Det. of Darling, No. 9 / 04-1703,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's mental abnormality - pedophilia - was a proper foundation for his commitment under Iowa Code ch. 229A. The fact that appellant's mental retardation made it unlikely that he could effectively participate in cognitive behavioral therapy did not preclude his commitment under chapter 229A.
|
|||||
| Iowa Supreme Court Atty. Disciplinary Bd. v. McCann, No. 07 / 05-1643,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney's license to practice law in Iowa was suspended for two years because the attorney committed multiple acts of neglecting clients' matters, and converted a total of $ 3250 in retainers from clients for his personal or business use.
|
|||||
| State v. Hoskins, No. 15 / 04-1698,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, March 31, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probable cause for a warrantless search existed, Fourth Amendment, where an informant had never given false information, he had supplied information over fifty times, past information from the informant had led to the discovery of drugs and other contraband, and an officer corroborated the information.
|
|||||
| In re Det. of Bradford, No. 138 / 04-1707,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, April 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Amendments to Iowa's sexually violent predator act, Iowa Code ch. 229A (2003) did not change it from civil in nature to criminal; therefore, an offender's ex post facto and double jeopardy rights were not violated.
|
|||||
| Iowa Sup. Ct. Atty. Disciplinary Bd. v. Lesyshen, No. 45 / 05-1954,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, April 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an attorney failed to pursue appeals in violation of Iowa Code Prof. Resp. DR 6-101(A)(3), failed to cooperate with disciplinary authorities, failed to deposit client funds in a trust account, and made an inadequate withdrawal from a case, she was suspended indefinitely, but for at least two years.
|
|||||
| K & W Elec., Inc. v. State, No. 47 / 04-0643,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, April 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment against a property owner in its tort and inverse condemnation claims against the State was affirmed because State established as a matter of law that it was immune from tort liability under Iowa Code § 669.14(8) for its design and construction of a highway project and claims were time-barred by Iowa Code § 614.1(4).
|
|||||
| State v. Shanahan, No. 19 / 04-0855,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, April 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's motion to suppress evidence was properly denied where search warrant was supported by probable cause as required by the Fourth Amendment, as affidavit included, inter alia, defendant's statements that her husband was not returning and results of officers' nationwide search for the husband after his disappearance.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
