 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Collins v. Mason City, No. 5-947 / 05-0104,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in granting summary judgment for city and its employees on former police officer's age discrimination claim because she did not file a written resistance or other documentation to show there were genuine issues of material fact for trial as required by Iowa R. Civ. P. 1.981(3), which was fatal to all theories of liability.
|
|||||
| First Sierra Equities, L.L.C. v. Signature Partners-Des Moines, L.L.C., No. 5-978 / 04-1068,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly granted for seller, city, and engineering/architectural firms in buyers' action based on construction defects in an apartment complex because city did not waive immunity under Iowa Code § 670.7; "as is" provision was enforceable, and Iowa Code ch. 542B did not authorize a private cause of action against licensed firms.
|
|||||
| Gamble v. State, No. 6-150 / 04-1965,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In applicant's request for postconviction relief, district court properly rejected application because applicant failed to show ineffective assistance of counsel because strategy in choosing not to impeach victim was reasonable. Appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise issue on direct appeal.
|
|||||
| In re B.B., No. 6-020 / 05-0640,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under criteria in Iowa Code § 229.1(15), substantial evidence did not support trial court's finding of serious mental impairment because physician's report said patient's depression was treatable with medicine, and physicians agreed that alcohol dependence or mild dementia would not result in being unable to satisfy his needs or care for himself.
|
|||||
| In re C.B., No. 6-208 / 06-0130,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of parental rights of mother and father under Iowa Code § 232.116 was upheld, as reasonable efforts were made to reunite family under Iowa Code § 232.102(10)(a). As aid to visitation, days, locations, and supervisors were changed; gas cards were provided to parents; and arrangements were made for children to be transported to parents.
|
|||||
| In re Karagi, No. 6-184 / 05-0342,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court did not err by granting unsupervised, unrestricted visitation to a father, Iowa Code § 598.41, where the father passed a polygraph examination, he had no charges pending for the alleged abuse incident, and social services did not step in to take any further action.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Birnley, No. 6-200 / 05-1950,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a husband's income had fluctuated and his wife had shown some ability to produce income, there had been a change of circumstances, but because that change in circumstances was clearly contemplated by the district court at the time the parties' dissolution decree was entered, a modification of alimony was not warranted.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Dostal, No. 6-194 / 05-1401,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court properly denied a mother's motion to modify child custody where her poor relationship with the father's girlfriend, as well as his move, did not constitute changed circumstances; the children were doing well with the father and they were in a stable environment.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Lenz, No. 6-199 / 05-1846,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In motion to modify physical custody and visitation, district court properly denied the motion because the father failed to meet his burden by showing a change of circumstances or how a change in physical custody or visitation would benefit child. Appellate court, however, was troubled by mother's conduct with respect to visitation.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Miller-Weatherford, No. 6-132 / 05-0820,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In divorce matter, husband's pro se application to district court after default decree was entered was not a violation of procedure under Iowa Code ch. 665 because contempt statute was quasi-criminal, which required strict construction, and appellate court refused to make assumption that husband's application was request for contempt finding.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
