 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Iowa Grocery Indus. Ass'n v. City of Des Moines, No. 40 /04-1914,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, April 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because Des Moines, Iowa, Ordinance § 10-54(3) (2004) conflicted with regulation of liquor licensing under the Iowa Alcoholic Beverages Control Act, the ordinance was preempted and the district court correctly declared the ordinance illegal and correctly entered summary judgment in favor of a grocers' association in its declaratory judgment action.
|
|||||
| Iowa Supreme Court Atty. Disciplinary Bd. v. Walker, No. 31 / 05-1989,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, April 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended indefinitely with no reinstatement for 6 months for violations of Iowa Code Prof. Resp. DR 1-102(A)(1), 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(5), 1-102(A)(6), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(1), 7-101(A)(2) and 7-101(A)(3) for neglecting client's legal matters, making misrepresentations to court and a client, and not responding to disciplinary board.
|
|||||
| Passehl Estate v. Passehl, No. 27 / 04-0874,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, April 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by enforcing a penalty provision in a settlement agreement regarding the estate's transfer of land the tenants had occupied because the estate failed to perform its obligations under the agreement where the deed presented by the estate contained an incorrect property description, thus the penalty provision was never triggered.
|
|||||
| Sturm v. Peoples Trust & Sav. Bank, No. 23 / 04-1139,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, April 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even if a bank had failed to comply with 12 U.S.C.S. § 2603, which provided for the development and use of a standard form disclosure statement called "HUD-1," the borrower had no cause of action; § 2603 did not provide a private cause of action for its violation even though other provisions in RESPA specifically stated a private remedy existed.
|
|||||
| Iowa Supreme Court Atty. Disciplinary Bd. v. McGrath, No. 113 / 05-0575,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, April 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grievance Commission did not err in denying attorney's motion to compel discovery because the Disciplinary Board's investigation files were protected from discovery under Iowa Ct. R. 34.4(2), as well as investigator's testimony. Also attorney's attempt to exchange sex for legal services was clearly improper under Iowa Code Prof. Resp. DR 1-102.
|
|||||
| Kruse v. Iowa Dist. Court, No. 37/04-0078,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, April 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although probationer pled guilty to assault, rather than sexual abuse, the district court did not err in ordering him to register as a sex offender under Iowa Code § 692A.2(1) because his offense fell within the definition of "criminal offense against a minor" in Iowa Code § 692A.1(5), which included any indictable offense involving sexual conduct.
|
|||||
| Maghee v. Reade, No. 39 / 03-0841,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, April 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A prisoner was not entitled to appointment of counsel at state expense in a proceeding pursuant to Iowa Code § 610A.3 where earned time credit deductions were imposed for filing frivolous lawsuits because the loss of credits did not actually extend the prisoner's sentence and the proceeding was more like a prison disciplinary proceeding.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
