 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Marriage of Sobek, No. 6-143 / 05-1703,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A grant of primary physical care of the parties' child to the mother was appropriate where the mother could better minister to the child's long-term best interests as set forth in Iowa Code § 598.41(3). She had been the child's primary caretaker throughout the marriage and the father's involvement during the parties' marriage was limited.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Winwood, No. 6-102 / 05-0950,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court had equitably divided parties' marital assets where it properly considered the proceeds from a bonus trust as income rather than a gift under Iowa Code § 598.21(2) (2005) and properly acknowledged the husband's predominant economic contribution to the accumulation of the parties' substantial assets.
|
|||||
| In re Petition of Evans, No. 6-142 / 05-1601,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In reviewing father's request for custody of child, appellate court determined that joint physical was appropriate because it was in child's best interests to safeguard the child, and it was a workable situation.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of A.C., No. 6-258 / 06-0254,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of mother's parental rights under Iowa Code § 232.116(1)(d) was proper because child could not be returned to her care, as mother continued in violent relationship with boyfriend, she was unable to maintain stable residence, she had not improved her parenting skills, and it was not in child's best interests to continue case any longer.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of A.R., No. 6-260 / 06-0278,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decision not to terminate the mother's parental rights and allow additional time to achieve reunification was affirmed because the problem had always been the mother's contact with the father and the domestic violence in their relationship, and with the father now in prison, the likelihood of violation of the no-contact order had lessened.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of F.K., No. 6-267 / 06-0279,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of father's parental rights under Iowa Code § 232.116(1)(l) was upheld because father did not request different or additional reunification services prior to termination hearing, and termination was in child's best interests, as father remained unable to provide safe and stable home because of alcohol abuse and aggressive behavior.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of J.W., No. 6-206 / 06-0253,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court properly terminated a mother's parental rights, Iowa Code § 232.116, where the mother's problems with anger management led her to be physically abusive to one child, she was continually verbally abusive and threatening to others, she did not think she had a problem with anger management, and she was resistant to change.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of R.L., No. 6-289 / 06-0378,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Iowa Code § 232.116(1)(b), there was clear and convincing evidence that the parents had abandoned their child where the father was incarcerated and had no contact with the child and the mother had not participated in services. Termination of parental rights was in the best interest of the child.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of S.J., No. 6-174 / 05-1900,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly terminated the father's parental rights under Iowa Code § 232.116(f) where the father had not spent much time with the children and continued to deny that he had any sort of anger problem; he did not demonstrate he understood the children's needs and termination of parental rights was in the best interests of the children.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of T.J., No. 6-263 / 06-0039,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Juvenile court properly terminated the mother's parental rights to her children pursuant to Iowa Code § 232.116 where placement of daughter with the father was proper and she could not be placed with mother due to her substance abuse problems. It was not in the children's best interest to grant mother additional time to reunite with the children.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
