 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Renaud, No. 6-152 / 05-0537,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of domestic abuse assault, Iowa Code §§ 236.2(2)(a) 708.1(2), 708.2A(4), as 1) defendant struck victim (his wife) in the back of the head with such force that it felt like a rock; and 2) although victim initiated fight, defendant continued the incident and committed an assault before any need for self-defense arose.
|
|||||
| State v. Senseman, No. 6-160 / 05-0829,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a sexual abuse case, a court did not err by excluding defendant's witness's proposed testimony that the victim had to the witness that "defendant did not do anything" because defendant did not afford the victim an opportunity to explain or deny the alleged prior inconsistent statements, Iowa R. Evid. 5.613.
|
|||||
| Western Iowa Coop. v. Woodbury County Bd. of Review, No. 6-164 / 05-0989,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, April 26, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a taxpayer's protest to the county board of review's assessment of its properties, as the dates and values in the taxpayer's petitions were essential matters necessary to assure the reasonable objectives of Iowa Code § 441.37, denial of the taxpayer's petitions as untimely was proper when the taxpayer provided incorrect assessment year dates.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
