 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Iowa Supreme Court Atty. Disciplinary Bd. v. Dull, No. 43 / 05-2024,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, April 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney's license to practice law was suspended for two years where she appeared in court while under influence of alcohol, was convicted of a felony, neglected legal matters, and failed to respond to inquiries during disciplinary proceedings. In so doing, she violated Iowa Code Prof. Resp. DR 7-106(C)(6) and 1-102(A)(5)-(6), among other rules.
|
|||||
| State v. Leckington, No. 17/04-1361,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, April 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was insufficient to sustain defendant's convictions under Iowa Code §§ 726.3 and 726.6 (2003) where the evidence showed that he had merely acquiesced in his wife's decision to leave a child unsupervised in their home and his mere presence as an adult in a car while they were driving to the home did not show he had control of the child.
|
|||||
| State v. Leckington, No. 20/04-1368,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, April 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported defendant's conviction for child endangerment resulting in serious injury under Iowa Code § 726.6(4) as defendant exhibited necessary control over child by picking him from a third party's apartment after that party told her that child was intoxicated and then moved him, in his vulnerable condition, to her own home.
|
|||||
| Fairfax v. Oaks Dev. Co., No. 140/04-1729,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, May 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a forfeiture matter, district court erred in determining that a development company's notice of forfeiture was sufficient under Iowa Code § 656.2 because notice was served on only one of two vendees, which was not valid personal service on both.
|
|||||
| Green v. Racing Ass'n of Cent. Iowa, No. 11 / 04-0758,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, May 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Racing association that barred certain jockeys from access to a racetrack pending an investigation into an alleged racial harassment incident was entitled to summary judgment on the jockeys' due process claim under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 because the racing association was not so involved with the county to be rendered a state actor.
|
|||||
| Hallett Constr. Co. v. Meister, No. 135 / 04-0525,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, May 5, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Landowners' claim to recover property against mineral rights lessee was governed by 10-year statute of limitations, Iowa Code § 614.1(5), and thus not barred because relief sought was recovery of real property and fraud was merely incidental in proving no valid contract existed, but fraud claim was barred by 5-year limitations statute, § 614.1(4).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
