|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Iowa - May 24, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In the Interest of A.H., No. 6-264 / 06-0312,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, May 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Three minor children should have been adjudicated child in need of assistance under Iowa Code § 232.2(6)(b), (c)(2) where an eyewitness, eldest child, clearly told police officers, social workers, his daycare provider, and his mother that the father had spanked the children with a belt, and child's statements were supported by physical evidence.
|
|
| |
In the Interest of D.V., No. 6-391 / 06-0513,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, May 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Child was adjudicated a child in need of assistance pursuant to Iowa Code § 232.2(6)(b), Iowa Code § 232.2(6)(c)(1), Iowa Code § 232.2(6)(c)(2), and Iowa Code § 232.2(6)(n). Parental rights' termination was proper, pursuant to Iowa Code § 232.116, because father abandoned child; he never showed more than a subjective interest in his child.
|
|
| |
In the Interest of H.B., No. 6-394 / 06-0516,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, May 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In termination of parental rights matter, trial court properly determined, pursuant to Iowa Code § 232.116, that father's parental rights should be terminated because father did not participate in reunification plan, he missed drug and alcohol testing, he failed to maintain sobriety, and he failed to maintain significant contacts with children.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|