LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Iowa - June 13, 2007

  
Annett Holdings, Inc. v. Allen, No. 7-270 / 06-1009, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a worker's compensation matter, truck driver was resident of Illinois, and employer was Iowa corporation. Commissioner properly determined that jurisdiction in Iowa was correct, pursuant to Iowa Code § 85.71(1), because definition of "regularly" required an employee's physical presence in state.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bear v. State, No. 7-149 / 06-1048, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a second degree murder case, while the prosecutor's "was he lying" question to defendant about the veracity of a State's witness's testimony was improper, defendant suffered no prejudice as the question was a single, isolated incident and was not revisited in closing argument.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Govan v. State, No. 7-280 / 06-0609, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Counsel was not ineffective for failing to challenge sufficiency of evidence to support jury's finding that defendant was guilty of second-degree robbery, in violation of Iowa Code § 711.3, because contrary to defendant's assertion, fact that he relinquished packages of meat before leaving a grocery store did not negate "intent to deprive" element.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Heath v. State, No. 7-227 / 06-0492, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Postconviction relief was denied after a conviction for first-degree murder because neither trial counsel nor appellate counsel were ineffective for failing to object to or raise an issue relating to the admission of an expert in gang activity; the defense theory of pointing the finger at someone else required the admission of some of the evidence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Delehoy, No. 7-160 / 06-1852, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Despite prior instability due to a violent relationship and a criminal record, a mother was given physical care of a child because she had ended the relationship and had made efforts to improve her instability; however, a father was given additional visitation since it was in the best interest of the child under Iowa Code § 598.41(1)(a).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Marriage of Hansen, No. 6-1088 / 06-1112, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because the father failed to show a substantial change in circumstances since the entry of the original dissolution decree and failed to prove he possessed the ability to provide superior care for the teenaged children, denial of his application to modify the dissolution decree to place physical care of the children with him was proper.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Marriage of Minnaert, No. 7-298 / 06-2003, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in terminating an ex-husband's alimony obligation to his former wife when she was remarried as extraordinary circumstances supported her need for alimony, including that she had health problems and expensive medical insurance, and that she was only employed part-time and her new husband was only partly able to assist her.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Marriage of Palek, No. 7-113 / 06-1552, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Despite one child's preference, a father was properly awarded physical care of two minor children because a mother was not more financially stable based on her acceptance of a job in Illinois right before the divorce that did not significantly improve her financial situation; moreover, the father's work and home environments were established.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Marriage of Salkil, No. 7-333 / 06-1697, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in ordering former wife to pay former husband the value of personal property that he had left in the marital home two years before the marriage dissolution hearing because the items were already lost at the time of the hearing, which was relevant date in terms of property distribution, and the assets' value at that time was zero.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Marriage of Shilling, No. 7-031 / 06-0820, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A former husband's request for the termination of military benefits paid to his former wife was denied because the husband was unable to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the wife and her boyfriend had a common law marriage; there was no substantial holding out to the public in general.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.