|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Iowa - June 13, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In the Interest of R.N.H., No. 7-420 / 07-0785,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Termination of mother's parental rights under Iowa Code § 232.116(1)(d), (e), (f), and (i) was upheld because termination was in children's best interests; mother failed to comply with or complete majority of services offered, including substance abuse treatment and individual and family therapy, and children could not be returned to her custody.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Johnson v. Dalton Auto Sales, Inc., No. 7-268 / 06-0970,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 13, 2007, FiledFiled
View this case - free
|
Overview: Where employees were required to use their own tools to work on cars, and they were destroyed during a fire, a building owner was liable under a theory of mutual bailment; there was a presumption of negligence, and the fire was caused by water leakage in the building, which was under the owner's control.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mosher v. Div. of Health Facilities, No. 7-275 / 06-1352,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Substantial evidence under Iowa Code § 17A.19 supported a finding that appellant engaged in dependent adult abuse in violation of Iowa Code § 235B.2 because there was testimony that, if believed, established that appellant was scene pushing a facility resident, causing him to fall to the floor, slide backwards, and nearly hit his head.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|