 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Johansen, No. 6-451 / 05-1106,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court vacated defendant's sentence following his guilty plea to delivery of a controlled substance to a minor under Iowa Code § 124.406 because the trial court failed to consider all of the sentencing options that were available to it pursuant to Iowa Code § 907.03.
|
|||||
| State v. Miles, No. 6-430 / 05-1562,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction under Iowa Code § 124.401(1)(c)(6) and sentence for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine were reversed because the evidence was insufficient, as the only evidence of any agreement between defendant and another was his statement involving elimination of a $ 20 debt in exchange for providing psuedoephedrine.
|
|||||
| State v. Petra, No. 6-463 / 05-1906,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed defendant's sentence following her guilty plea, for two counts of delivery of less than five grams of methamphetamine, in violation of Iowa Code §§ 124.401 (1)(c)(6) and 124.413, because the sentencing reduction provisions of Iowa Code § 901.10 did not apply where defendant was not a first-time offender.
|
|||||
| State v. Porter, No. 6-382 / 05-1522,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in accepting defendant's guilty pleas to burglary and criminal mischief under Iowa R. Crim. P. 2.8(2)( b) as he admitted to entering vehicles with the intent to commit theft and going with his roommate to open car doors and take whatever was inside, the car windows were broken, and damages amounted to $ 2257.86.
|
|||||
| State v. Thonethevaboth, No. 6-462 / 05-1821,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As defendant did not object to a list of convictions relied on by the trial court at a sentencing hearing, defendant could not claim on appeal that the convictions relied on by the trial court were his brother's and not his, as the error was not preserved for review pursuant to Iowa R. App. P. 6.4.
|
|||||
| State v. Todd, No. 6-465 / 05-1918,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant admitted that he knew all along about his niece's scheme to use another person's Medicaid card, a factual basis existed to support his plea of guilty to second-degree fraudulent practice, Iowa Code §§ 249A.8, 714.8, 714.10, and 703.1 (2005), and defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to challenge the plea.
|
|||||
| Wohlert v. Toal, No. 6-197 / 05-1629,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, June 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court properly modified child custody to a father, Iowa Code § 598.21, because the mother secretly moved the child to California, the father regularly exercised his visitation, he participated in the child's activities, and the father demonstrated a greater interest and ability to support the mother's relationship with the child.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
