 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Marriage of Horns, No. 6-583 / 06-0167,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An award of joint physical care of the mother and father's child to both parties was proper pursuant to Iowa Code §§ 598.1(1) and 598.41(1)(a) because both parents were capable and loving parents to the child and each was capable of providing for his long-range best interests. Their willingness to cooperate was to be commended.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Jorgensen, No. 6-575 / 05-1942,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Given the relatively short duration of parties' marriage, the wife's serious health problems from before the marriage, the generous property settlement, the fact that she was leaving the marriage in a better financial position than when she came in, and $ 3,000 in attorney fees, the court affirmed a ruling that monthly alimony was unnecessary.
|
|||||
| In re Marrige of Etringer, No. 6-581 / 06-0112,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court affirmed an order modifying a dissolution decree and fixing child support obligations because it was the father's duty as the appellant to provide a record on appeal affirmatively disclosing the alleged error he relied upon; because he did not, the court could not speculate as to what took place or predicate error on such speculation.
|
|||||
| In re Property Seized from Widmann, No. 6-381 /05-1511,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed an order of forfeiture of the individual's Cadillac as the State met its burden of proof under Iowa Code § 809A.4(2)(a)(2) that the car was used to facilitate drug trafficking as marijuana fragments were found in the spare tire well which was consistent with mid-level trafficking.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of A. B.-T., No. 6-596 /06-0948,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Termination of a father's parental rights under Iowa Code § 232.116 was upheld because termination was in the child's best interests, as the father did not participate in any services offered; by his actions, he had shown a lack of interest in his child; and he had not addressed his own problems, including domestic abuse and substance abuse.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of D.D., No. 6-595 /06-0901,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court properly terminated a father's parental rights, Iowa Code § 232.116, because he had not sufficiently addressed his anger management problems and he had not addressed his substance abuse problems; the father admitted that up to one month before the termination hearing he smoked marijuana at least once a day.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of H.R., No. 6-588 / 06-0915,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed the termination of the father's parental rights under Iowa Code § 232.116(1)(e) (2005) as the father remained unable to provide a safe and secure home for the child.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of L.P., No. 6-396 / 06-0458,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court reversed a termination of a mother's parental rights under Iowa Code § 232.116(1)(h) because while the mother was immature, the evidence showed that she was otherwise a loving mother and termination was not in the child's best interests.
|
|||||
| In the Interest of R.C., No. 6-589 /06-0675,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 9, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed the termination of a mother's parental rights to her four children under Iowa Code § 232.116 as it was clear the mother was unable or unwilling to parent her children as they had been removed from the home for most of the past three and one half years, and the children were thriving in their pre-adoptive foster care homes.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
