 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Davis, No. 7-493 / 06-1657,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction and sentence for willful injury, in violation of Iowa Code §§ 708.4 and 902.7 (2005), were upheld and her claim that counsel was ineffective when he failed to object to a jury instruction on self-defense was preserved for possible postconviction relief proceedings, because record was inadequate to address defendant's claim.
|
|||||
| State v. Hansen, No. 7-499 / 06-1735,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was insufficient to sustain an enticement conviction under Iowa Code § 710.10(2) because, although defendant certainly attempted to meet with the purported fifteen-year-old (an undercover officer), there were no invitations or offers, nor was there any discussion or enticement "to enter any vehicle, building, room or secluded place."
|
|||||
| State v. Hunt, No. 7-477 / 06-1195,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under Iowa R. Evid. 5.103, even if district court abused its discretion in allowing defendant's statements to a law enforcement officer, such error was harmless where the overwhelming evidence clearly established that defendant was the shooter in the incident and the admission of testimony did not injuriously affect defendant's substantial rights.
|
|||||
| State v. Jennings, No. 7-317 / 06-0536,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court had not abused its discretion by imposing 5-year sentencing enhancement under Iowa Code § 124.401A; inter alia, it noted all information in PSI report, including fact defendant had lengthy record of criminal convictions, including prior burglary conviction for which he was granted probation, later had probation revoked, and was imprisoned.
|
|||||
| State v. Lampman, No. 7-462 / 06-0685,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in ordering sentence to run consecutively to 2 previous sentences imposed on defendant for other offenses rather than concurrently as, inter alia, court mentioned defendant was on parole when he committed current offense and explained it wished to punish each crime committed separately so as not to grant him a free offense.
|
|||||
| State v. Norman, No. 7-471 / 06-0988,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Search was proper under the Fourth Amendment because, while speaking with defendant, who had rolled down the window, an officer noticed a pile of money on defendant's lap, he noticed a plastic bag under the bills, the bag had a white substance in it, and defendant then consented to a search and let the money and bag in his lap fall to the ground.
|
|||||
| State v. Reifenstahl, No. 7-469 / 06-0962,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no violation of defendant's speedy trial rights under Iowa R. Crim. P. 2.33, because the delay of only ten days was reasonable to allow the alleged victim, who's testimony was important to the State, to take care of her sister's burial and other family matters, and there was no showing that defendant was prejudiced.
|
|||||
| State v. Stump, No. 7-495 / 06-1679,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, August 8, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to sustain an arson conviction under Iowa Code § 712.1 because defendant took out a renters' insurance policy a few days before the fire, defendant's vehicles suffered no damage because they were moved from their normal location, defendant seemed fully dressed at 3:00 a.m., and there were clothes for the children in the van.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
