LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Iowa - September 7, 2006

  
State v. Byrd, No. 6-614 / 05-1469, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, September 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Evidence was sufficient to convict defendant of second-degree robbery as defendant refused to stop after security alarms went off and several store employees and a uniformed officer told him to stop, defendant fled from the scene and assaulted the officer when confronted, and an unpaid for item was found on defendant.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Hicks, No. 6-608 / 05-1021, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, September 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a second-degree criminal mischief case, denial of defendant's motion to suppress was proper as the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest defendant without a warrant under Iowa Const. art. art. I, § 8 where defendant lied about where he had been and had the motive, means, and opportunity to commit the vandalism on his ex-wife's car.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Hoover, No. 6-620 / 05-1714, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, September 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Conviction for sexual abuse in violation of Iowa Code § 709.4(2)(c)(4) was affirmed because there was a sufficient factual basis established to show that there had been a sex act between defendant and the victim, when defendant admitted to the testimony filed with the information that described sexual intercourse between defendant and a minor.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Petersen, No. 6-525 / 05-0757, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, September 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's conviction for possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver while in possession of firearm, contrary to Iowa Code §§ 124.401(1)(b)(7) and 124.401(1)(e)(3), was supported by the evidence where drugs were found in his vehicle, in bag containing his clothing; it was sufficient to permit an inference that he knew of drugs' presence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Watson, No. 6-615 / 05-1518, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, September 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's conviction and sentence for delivery of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school were upheld because defendant's motions for judgment of acquittal made at the close of State's evidence and renewed at close of all evidence were insufficient to preserve sufficiency of evidence claim for review, as the motions lacked sufficient specificity.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Tripp v. Cedar Valley Med. Specialists, P.C., No. 6-425 / 05-1123, COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, September 7, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court did not err in giving result-of-treatment and alternate-methods-of-treatment jury instructions as record supported instruction stating mere fact wife did not fully recover from her wrist fracture, or that doctors' treatments were not entirely successful, did not mean they were negligent or at fault for wife's subsequent pain and impairment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.