|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Iowa - September 21, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In the Interest of M.J.V., No. 6-726 / 06-1123,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, September 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In termination of parental rights matter, there was no basis for trial judge's recusal because judge never indicated, in earlier proceeding, that he would not be further involved in matter. Decision to terminate parental rights was supported because State proved, by clear and convincing evidence, essential elements of Iowa Code § 232.116(1)(f).
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In the Interest of S.B., No. 6-760 / 06-1257,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, September 21, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Termination of parental rights was in the children's best interests, Iowa Code § 232.116, because the parents failed to visit one child, they were unable to address her special needs, and both children were bonded with their foster parents, who intended to adopt them.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|