 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Parentage of Shade, No. 93,921,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, January 20, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Finding against the mother was improper where the presumption of paternity that was established when father voluntarily agreed to the placement of his name on the child's birth certificate was not rebutted by clear and convincing evidence or by a decree that established paternity of the child by another man pursuant to Kan. Stat. Ann. § 38-1114(b).
|
|||||
| State v. Taylor, No. 91,994,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, January 20, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions for possession of anhydrous ammonia in an unapproved container and possession of drug paraphernalia, both with the intent to manufacture a controlled substance, were proper where the jury had evidence upon which it could have found that defendant had knowledge of the contraband in the car as he attempted to elude the police.
|
|||||
| Thompson v. Hilltop Lodge, Inc., No. 94,006,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, January 20, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's finding that neighbors did not acquire disputed land by adverse possession and were not entitled to costs of improvements made on land was supported by sufficient evidence that showed both parties maintained the land; neighbor's deed did not profess to convey the land; and neighbors did not have a good faith belief of ownership.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
