 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Hoge, No. 94,774,
SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, February 9, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was convicted of first-degree murder and aggravated robbery. Defendant moved, pro se, to correct an allegedly illegal sentence. Relief was not available, pursuant to Kan. Stat. Ann. § 22-3504, because of the type of defects defendant alleged in his complaint. Motions, files, and record did not demonstrate grounds for relief.
|
|||||
| State v. Jones, No. 93,643,
SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, February 9, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not subjected to a custodial interrogation while meeting with the officers in the conference room to prepare to testify in another suspect's prosecution for the murders, and therefore Miranda warnings were not required, because a reasonable person would have felt free to leave.
|
|||||
| Williamson v. Amrani, No. 95,154,
SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, February 9, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the Kansas Consumer Protection Act's (KCPA) language was broad enough to encompass a claim regarding the providing of medical care or treatment services brought by a patient against a physician for a violation under the KCPA, the district court erred by granting the surgeon summary judgment in the patient's action.
|
|||||
| Picard v. Sugar Valley Lakes Homes Ass'n, No. 96,225,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, February 16, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a homeowners association amended the bylaws as to the number of board members, but failed to file the amendment, a subsequent election was upheld because, inter alia, the members ratified the amendment and, regarding an argument under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 17-6505, the bylaws had always limited membership on the payment of association dues.
|
|||||
| State v. Anguiano, No. 95,716,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, February 16, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a deputy stopped defendant while walking because he "semifit" the description of a wanted man, suppression was warranted under the Fourth Amendment because the description was so generic as to defy reasonable suspicion of criminal activity and mere inconsistency between an origin and direction of travel did not provide reasonable suspicion.
|
|||||
| State v. Hawkins, No. 95,310,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, February 16, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's DUI conviction was upheld because he failed to preserve his arguments for appeal; remand was necessary regarding reimbursement of court-appointed attorney fees under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 22-4513, but the imposition of the $ 100 application fee was proper under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 22-4529 because defendant failed to object.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
