 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City of Andover v. Southwestern Bell Tel., L.P., No. 96,823,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, March 9, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a City's tort claim alleging a telephone company's negligence in not promptly locating its buried cables forced the City into later making a contract with the company to move those cables, denial of the company's motion to compel arbitration was proper as claims in tort were exempt under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 5-401(c)(3).
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Branch, No. 95,756,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, March 9, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court did not err in finding that the ex-husband's severance package was income subject to child support because the definition of income as defined by the Kansas Child Support Guidelines encompassed severance pay such as the ex-husband's, which was based upon his wages and was a benefit from his contract to compensate him for a layoff.
|
|||||
| Mendoza v. DCS Sanitation, No. 96,548,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, March 9, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an employee slipped and fell while picking up his paycheck, his injuries were compensable under the Workers Compensation Act because the work-related errand exception to the going and coming rule applied since the employer directed employees to pick up paychecks at a location separate and apart from the workplace.
|
|||||
| State v. Scoville, No. 96,405,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, March 9, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: . In our case, although there was no evidence that defendant definitely was informed of the time limitation attendant to his right to appeal, there was substantial competent evidence demonstrating that he knew of his appeal rights.
|
|||||
| State v. Zeckser, No. 96,566,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, March 9, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City marshal had jurisdiction to stop defendant outside city limits, because the city marshal was also a county deputy sheriff and the offense occurred in the county; the city marshal's jurisdiction as a county deputy sheriff was not limited under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 22-2401a by the fact that he was also employed as a city law enforcement officer.
|
|||||
| In re Kennard, No. 98,058,
SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, March 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 217, the Supreme Court of Kansas accepted an attorney's surrender of his license to practice law where the hearings panel had found that he had violated Kan. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.15, 3.2, 3.4, and 8.4(c) and failed to cooperate in two disciplinary cases, and the panel had recommended disbarment.
|
|||||
| In re Ware, No. 93,131,
SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, March 12, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
