 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gudenkauf v. Kan. Dep't of Revenue, No. 94,635,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, May 12, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an officer placed a copy of the officer's certification and notice of suspension form with a driver's belongings after the driver refused to accept it, there was sufficient service under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-303(d)(4); therefore, a dismissal for failure to comply with Kan. Stat. Ann. § 8-1002(c) was improper.
|
|||||
| State v. Chesbro, No. 93,454,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, May 12, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although defendant was not informed of the maximum penalty applicable through persistent sex offender provisions in Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-4704(j), he did not receive more than sentencing range described by trial court; thus, motion to withdraw his guilty plea to indecent liberties with child, Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-3504(a)(3)(A), was properly denied.
|
|||||
| In re Lehr, Bar Docket No. 13990,
SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, May 15, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an attorney disciplinary matter, attorney's voluntary surrender of license to practice law, pursuant to Kan. Sup. Ct. R. 217, was accepted because testimony had shown, among other things, that attorney failed to file two appellate briefs, and his admitted use of marijuana and cocaine was alleged to have caused a mistrial in another matter.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
