LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Kansas - May 25 - June 1, 2007

  
Fleetwood Enters. v. Coleman Co., No. 95,796, COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, May 25, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: District court improperly granted summary judgment enjoining defendant from using its trademark because defendant had entered into an agreement with plaintiff's subsidiary whereby defendant was permitted to use its trademark in exchange for royalty payments and issues of fact remained as to whether the subsidiary was plaintiff's alter ego.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Found. Property Invs., LLC v. CTP, LLC, No. 96,697, COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, May 25, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: District court improperly granted summary judgment to a lender in its action to foreclose a promissory note based on an acceleration clause because the lender, by accepting 10 late payments without objection, had established a course of dealing under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 84-1-205(1) and had waived its right to accelerate the note.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ponds v. Hertz Corp., No. 96,543, COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, May 25, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Summary judgment was properly awarded to an insurer in an action by a deceased passenger's daughter to recover damages where the rented vehicle that the passenger was riding in was not an "insured car" under the insured renter's policy; the temporary rental car did not serve as a replacement vehicle under the clear meaning of the policy language.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. McCormick, No. 92,408, COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, May 25, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: District court did not violate defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel by refusing to appoint substitute counsel because the irreconcilable breakdown in communication alleged by defendant was his own fault, caused by his attempts to control defense tactical decisions. Moreover, defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Underhill v. Thompson, No. 96,290, COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, May 25, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: The district court properly granted summary judgment on a negligence claim, which arose from a minor vehicle accident, because plaintiff did not serve defendant, and thereby commence the action, until after the two-year statute of limitations of Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-513(a)(4) had run, and Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-517 did not apply to toll the statute.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Protest of United AG Servs., No. 95,947, COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, June 1, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court erred in upholding county's tax assessments on grain elevators that were on land leased from railroad because undervaluation of real estate qualified neither as "escaped" under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 79-1475, nor as clerical error subject to correction under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 79-1701 et seq.; there was no statutory vehicle to support assessments.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.