LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Kansas - July 27, 2007

  
State v. Miller, No. 95,815, SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, July 27, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Even though the trial court abused its discretion by admitting into evidence two commercial photographic photographs that were found on defendant's computer, as they were not relevant under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-401(b), the error was harmless given the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt of murdering his wife.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Noah, No. 91,353, SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, July 27, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's aggravated indecent liberties conviction was reversed and remanded for new trial as the limitation of defendant's cross-examination of the child victim, and the subsequent admission of her hearsay statements, violated defendant's right to confrontation under U.S. Const. amend. VI and Kan. Const. Bill Rights § 10.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Swenson v. State, No. 94,207, SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, July 27, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In an attempted first-degree murder case, denial of defendant's motion under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-1507 was error as the filing of a petition for review one day out-of-time, which caused the denial, constituted ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.