 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sparks v. CBIZ Accounting, Tax & Advisory of Kan. City, Inc., No. 95,538,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, September 22, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court reversed a grant of a shareholder's motion to pursue a derivative action against an accounting firm as a direct action because the close corporation exception did not apply where the shareholder was not an oppressed minority shareholder bringing suit against majority directors, officers, or directors for breach of a fiduciary duty.
|
|||||
| State v. Delgado, No. 95,019,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, September 22, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was convicted of possession of marijuana, possession of marijuana without tax stamps, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Trial court did not err in denying motion to suppress evidence seized when he was a passenger because officer had reasonable suspicion to stop car for having lights that violated Kan. Stat. Ann. § 8-1701 et seq.
|
|||||
| Troutman v. Curtis, No. 94,667,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, September 22, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for manufacturer was proper because state common-law tort claims alleging liability as to premarket approved Class III medical device were preempted by 21 U.S.C.S. § 360k(a) of the 1976 Medical Device Amendments to 1938 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, except for claims that manufacturer did not comply with approved federal standards.
|
|||||
| In re Estate of Roloff, No. 95,542,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, September 29, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the decedent did not reserve his growing crops in his transfer-on-death deed, the growing crops passed with the title to the land to his employee as the grantee beneficiary; thus, title vested in the employee immediately upon the decedent's death under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 59-3504.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Crane, No. 94,321,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, September 29, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court abused its discretion by refusing to enter a final order dividing the marital property under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-1610(b)(1) as the statute conferred jurisdiction to divide the property, not to delay the division indefinitely; the trial court could not retain jurisdiction to divide retirement benefits the husband might later receive.
|
|||||
| State v. Gomez, No. 93,591,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, September 29, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's two convictions for criminal discharge of a firearm at an occupied vehicle under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-4219(b) were multiplicitous and violated defendant's double jeopardy rights because the number of persons occupying a vehicle or building at the time of the firearm's discharge was not determinative of the unit of prosecution.
|
|||||
| Christopher v. State ex rel. Kan. Juvenile Justice Auth., No. 95,077,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, October 6, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was entered for the State in a negligence case arising from an injury suffered at a juvenile facility during educational activities because immunity existed under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 75-6104(u); moreover, an equal protection argument was meritless since there was a rational basis in the promotion of education for juvenile offenders.
|
|||||
| Davis v. Allstate Ins. Co., No. 96,043,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, October 6, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An insured was unable to recover UIM benefits under her car insurance based on the exclusion in Kan. Stat. Ann. § 40-284(e)(1) since a motorcycle the insured was riding on was covered under a policy from a different insurer with lower limits; the husband's motorcycle was provided for the insured's regular use as a passenger.
|
|||||
| State v. Maloney, No. 95,887,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, October 6, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Following defendant's felony theft conviction, the district court did not err by ordering her to pay $ 9,395 in restitution under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-4610(d)(1) for items of household goods taken by her. The district court was permitted to calculate restitution based on the replacement cost of the stolen property rather than its fair market value.
|
|||||
| State v. Lopez, No. 93,560,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, October 13, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to support conviction for aggravated assault. Matter was remanded to the trial court for reassessment of costs and attorney's fees, pursuant to Kan. Stat. Ann. § 22-3801 and Kan. Stat. Ann. § 22-4513 when defendant was acquitted on one charge and defendant's financial situation had not been considered under § 22-4513.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
