 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Allen, Bar Docket No. 21145,
SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, December 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court accepted attorney's voluntary surrender of his license to practice law in Kansas. At the time the attorney surrendered his license, a panel hearing was pending on a formal complaint; in addition, the attorney was a convicted felon, having been convicted of felony theft.
|
|||||
| State v. Simmons, No. 91,659,
SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, December 15, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an aggravated kidnapping case, the court properly refused to give an accomplice jury instruction because the witness's testimony, which was corroborated by other witnesses, was that he was vehemently opposed to defendant's decision to commit the crime, and thus, there was no evidence of any agreement under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-3302.
|
|||||
| Bruch v. Kan. Dep't of Revenue, No. 95,029,
SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, December 22, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Driver whose license was suspended did not demonstrate that the Kan. Stat. Ann. § 8-259 de novo review process should alter the fact that his petition for review was jurisdictional and that the failure to comply with the pleading requirements set forth in Kan. Stat. Ann. § 77-614(b) precluded his statutorily granted right to appeal the suspension.
|
|||||
| In re Adoption of S.J.R., No. 96,388,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, December 22, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence supported the decision that father failed to assume duties of parent under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 59-2136(d) as (1) he did not support children monetarily; (2) he did not show his love and affection for children; and (3) although incarcerated, his contact with children was incidental. Thus, his consent to adoption by stepfather was unnecessary.
|
|||||
| In re D.T.J., No. 96,075,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, December 22, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Commissioner of Juvenile Justice had standing under Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 38-1665, 38-16,131 to challenge district court's 15 percent limitation on juvenile's good time credit; district court lacked authority to limit credit because Kan. Stat. Ann. § 38-16,130 gave Commissioner authority to implement credit and did not violate separation of powers.
|
|||||
| Rinke v. Bank of Am., No. 93,868,
SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS, December 22, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When an employee slipped and fell in a parking lot that the employer leased and had some measure of control over in that it directed the employees to park in allotted spaces adjacent to the employer's building, the employee was injured on the employer's premises and entitled to workers compensation benefits under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 44-501(a).
|
|||||
| Town Ctr. Shopping Ctr., LLC v. Premier Mortg. Funding, Inc., No. 94,917,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KANSAS, December 22, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a mortgage broker's branch manager entered into a lease, the mortgage broker was bound by the lease because the mortgage broker's good standing letter induced the lessor to believe that the manager had apparent authority to act; lessor was entitled to attorney fees without providing notice of default and an opportunity to cure.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
