 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Combs v. Ky. River Dist. Health Dep't, NO. 2005-CA-001135-WC,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, February 10, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Future medical benefits could be awarded to a workers' compensation claimant under Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 342.020(1) in the absence of a finding of disability, as it was possible that the claimant's non-disabling injury might still require medical attention.
|
|||||
| Embry v. Turner, NO. 2004-CA-002040-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, February 10, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no basis for new trial under Ky. R. Civ. P. 59.01 after jury verdict setting boundary line and settling ownership of a tract of land in neighbors as credibility of experts was jury matter, no parol agreement on location of boundary existed, and required elements of a boundary by equitable estoppel or adverse possession did not exist.
|
|||||
| Mardis v. Commonwealth, NO. 2004-CA-000632-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, February 10, 2006, Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Smith v. Commonwealth, NO. 2004-CA-001757-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, February 10, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since forfeiture under Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 218A.405 et seq. did not necessarily constitute an additional criminal punishment, there was no double jeopardy violation where the court ordered the forfeiture of defendant's vehicle, in which cocaine was found, after sentencing defendant to a prison term.
|
|||||
| Smith v. Smith, NO. 2004-CA-001028-MR, NO. 2004-CA-001056-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, February 10, 2006, Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Stewart v. Commonwealth, NO. 2004-CA-002573-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, February 10, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in sustaining the Commonwealth's objection to a response given by one of defendant's alibi witness's concerning the victim's character for truthfulness, because under the version of Ky. R. Evid. 608(a) applicable at the time of defendant's trial, said testimony, in the form of opinion or reputation, was admissible.
|
|||||
| Toler v. Rapid Am., NO. 2004-CA-002281-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, February 10, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As the trial record was unclear as to whether the court considered the Ward factors prior to dismissing an employee's injury action for asbestosis under both Ky. R. Civ. P. 41.02 and 77.02, but instead based its decision solely upon a two-and-a-half year lack of activity, vacation of said dismissal was ordered, and the case was remanded.
|
|||||
| United Structural Sys., Ltd. v. ERI Falls, Inc., NO. 2004-CA-002103-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, February 10, 2006, Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
