 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Easterling v. Man-O-War Auto., Inc., NO. 2005-CA-000114-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, April 20, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although passenger, who was injured in a single car accident, argued that car dealership violated Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 190.033 when it failed to provide liability coverage on a demonstrator vehicle driven by its employee, this argument was rejected. That dealership's insurer was insolvent did not make dealership liable.
|
|||||
| GMRI, Inc. v. Emberton, NO. 2005-CA-002355-MR AND NO. 2005-CA-002517-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, April 20, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Action against a restaurant alleging that a diner contracted hepatitis A after eating at the restaurant was time barred under Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 413.140(1) because, after he became ill, the diner simply did not attempt to determine where he contracted hepatitis A, and therefore was not entitled to invoke the discovery rule.
|
|||||
| Manning v. Willett, NO. 2005-CA-001620-DG,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, April 20, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by entering a sua sponte mutual protection order against a mother in a domestic violence proceeding against the father because there was no provision under Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 403.750(1)(h) and 403.715 that permitted the court to sua sponte enter the order when no petition for domestic violence was filed against the mother.
|
|||||
| Melton v. Melton, NO. 2006-CA-001032-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, April 20, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Clause restraining transfer of property was not unreasonable because the restraints were imposed by party grantors on themselves rather than on other grantees, there was no wrongful or fraudulent behavior, and the clause specifically provided for its own termination, either 21 years after the first grantor's death or upon last grantor's death.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
