 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Commonwealth v. EPI Corp., NO. 2005-CA-000274-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, April 14, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Medicaid recoupments against a long-term care facility operator were time-barred for the cost years 1988 through 1995 because they were not made within the 21-month time limit of 907 Ky. Admin. Regs. 1:110, § 3, but they were not barred for 1996, when that time limit was removed and the five-year limit of Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 413.120(2) applied.
|
|||||
| Hilltop Basic Res., Inc. v. County of Boone, NO. 2002-CA-001081-MR, NO. 2003-SC-001052-DG,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, April 14, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly found that fiscal court's rejection of commission's approval of owner's application for zoning map amendment under Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 100.213 was not arbitrary because there was not overwhelming evidence that commission's decision was correct and land use contemplated by owner was incompatible with land's classification.
|
|||||
| Ky. Legal Sys. Corp. v. Dunn, NO. 2004-CA-002352-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, April 14, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 382.270 and 382.280 were quite general and did not address the specific situation since a bank, as a purchase money lender, did not need to search for judgment liens, as it had first priority over a judgment lien regardless of whether it had notice of any kind of the interest.
|
|||||
| Powers v. Park, NO. 2005-CA-000707-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, April 14, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly granted summary judgment to defendants as to a patient's medical malpractice action, as the state long-arm statute, Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 454.210, did not provide personal jurisdiction because defendants did not have sufficient contacts with Kentucky based on their evaluations of the patient in Missouri.
|
|||||
| Spencer v. Spencer, NO. 2005-CA-001419-ME,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, April 14, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Since the trial court did not have personal jurisdiction over the husband, insofar as the Ky. Rev. Stat. § 403.725(1) protective order prohibited him from breaking the law in Kentucky by approaching the wife and child, it comported with due process. In all other respects, it went beyond the permissible limits of Kentucky courts' jurisdiction.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
