LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Kentucky - June 2 - June 9, 2006

  
Lay v. Commonwealth, NO. 2005-CA-000516-MR, COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 2, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: Sentencing defendant on both a DUI conviction and a Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 189A.090(1) driving on a suspended license conviction did not violate double jeopardy as each offense required different elements. The fact that defendant was DUI when he committed the § 189A.090 offense was used only to enhance his sentence and was not double jeopardy.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Dean v. Bondurant, 2005-SC-000872-D, SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY, June 7, 2006, Entered
View this case - free  

Overview: An attorney's contribution to a judge's campaign was not alone a basis for judicial recusal, but state supreme court justice recused himself; he received numerous contributions from attorneys in firm that was a party, contributions in aggregate were not minimal, and his impartiality could be reasonably questioned under Ky. Sup. Ct. R. 3.130, 4.300.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rankins v. Commonwealth, 2005-SC-0690-DG., SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY, June 7, 2006, Entered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Witten v. Pack, 2005-SC-0414-DG, SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY, June 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Blevins v. Lawrence, 2005-SC-0923-D, 2005-SC-0924-D, 2005-SC-0933-D, 2005-SC-0934-D, 2005-SC-0925-D, SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY, June 9, 2006, Entered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. Hutson, NO. 2004-CA-002160-MR, COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 9, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: Judgment for mortgagors was reversed as mortgagors suffered no damages. Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 382.365 did not violate Due Process Clause or Ky. Const. § 2 as mortgagors had duty to act reasonably and in good faith and mortgagors' rights flowed from contract, in which there was implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Whalen v. Commonwealth, NO. 2005-CA-000699-MR, COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 9, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: Although defendant only pointed a glove at a cashier, because a cashier believed that he had a weapon, defendant was not entitled to an acquittal; because the cashier was subject to recall as a witness, her out-of-court statements to a police officer fell within Ky. R. Evid. 801A(a)(2)'s exception to the hearsay rule.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wilson v. Lawhorn Ford Sales, Inc., NO. 2005-CA-000821-MR, COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 9, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in failing to award filing fee cost under Ky. R. Civ. P. 54.04 to successful buyer in an odometer fraud action, but costs for extra deposition copies and copying expenses were properly denied. Buyer's appeal of award of attorney's fees was dismissed because he failed to include law firm awarded fees as an appellant.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.