 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bray v. Commonwealth, NO. 2005-CA-001037-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 16, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in requiring appellant's sex offender registration information to be published on the Internet pursuant to Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 17.580. Retroactive application of the registration requirements did not violate appellant's state and federal protections against ex post facto legislation.
|
|||||
| Florman v. MEBCO Ltd. P'ship, NO. 2004-CA-001908-MR, NO. 2004-CA-002072-MR, NO. 2004-CA-002074-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 16, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred in ruling that mineral rights owners had rights to the limestone and clay on or underlying the surface owner's land, because under Kentucky law, clay and limestone, regardless of their value, were not minerals for purposes of a mineral deed.
|
|||||
| Andrew v. Begley, NO. 2005-CA-000273-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 23, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for a doctor and others was proper; patient's claims of negligence, assault and battery, and outrageous conduct were actually claims of medical malpractice, an expert witness was necessary to show a causal link between defendants' acts and her injuries, no such expert was produced, and her claims of pain were insufficient evidence.
|
|||||
| Beckham v. Commonwealth, NO. 2004-CA-002328-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 23, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was not error for the lower court to deny admission of testimony from defendant's girlfriend, a co-defendant charged for the same misconduct, because the girlfriend had a continued right against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment when she had entered a plea of guilty but had not been sentenced.
|
|||||
| General Steel Corp. v. Collins, NO. 2005-CA-001647-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 23, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decision of the lower court denying corporation's motion to arbitrate the breach of contract action was affirmed because a representative of the restaurant had obliterated the arbitration clause from the agreed-upon conditions. Pursuant to Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 355.2-201, the effect of the obliteration was to eliminate it from the agreement.
|
|||||
| McCombs v. Commonwealth, NO. 2004-CA-001850-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 23, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions for fourth-degree assault under Ky. Rev. Stat. § 508.030 and first-degree burglary under Ky. Rev. Stat. § 511.020 were reversed; jury did not specify, but if same physical injury was applied to each crime, convictions on both violated double jeopardy. Court erred in deciding as matter of law that crowbar was deadly weapon; it was not.
|
|||||
| McCombs v. Commonwealth, NO. 2004-CA-001850-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 23, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A jury had to decide if a crowbar was a deadly weapon and whether it was a dangerous instrument. Where the same injury proved physical injury under Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 511.020(1)(b) and 508.030(1)(a), they had identical culpable mental states and no element of fourth-degree assault differed from first-degree burglary, violating double jeopardy.
|
|||||
| Springer v. Bullitt County Bd. of Educ., NO. 2005-CA-001905-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 23, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lower court's decision to grant summary judgment to a school board and a school superintendent was affirmed because the board did not owe the former employee retroactive pay at a certified teacher salary pursuant to Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 161.020. School principal did not have authority to bind the Board, pursuant to Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 160.380.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
