LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Kentucky - June 29, 2007

  
Allen v. Woodford County Bd. of Adjustments, NO. 2006-CA-000603-MR, COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 29, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: Order affirming board's grant of conditional use permit to allow "tourist home" was proper because appellants admittedly became aware of zoning compliance officer's recommended interpretation of the term "tourist home" at earlier hearing, but did not timely appeal the officer's actions to the board as required by Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 100.261.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Fields v. Papa John's Int'l, Inc., NO. 2006-CA-000936-MR, COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 29, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: An employee failed to establish a prima facie showing of sexual discrimination based on a hostile work environment in violation of the Kentucky Civil Rights Act, Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 344.010 et seq. Her testimony revealed that the employer quickly responded to her complaints regarding name-calling and comments regarding her sexual practices.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Gilliam v. Methodist Hosp. of Ky., Inc., NO. 2006-CA-001218-MR, COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 29, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: Dismissal of employee's suit alleging wrongful termination due to his involvement with a union's efforts to organize workers was improper because employee made no claims for regulatory or injunctive relief within exclusive jurisdiction of NLRB, but sought only compensatory and punitive damages based on violation of Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 336.130.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Green's Motorcycle Salvage, Inc. v. Caneyville Volunteer Fire Dep't, NO. 2006-CA-001142-MR, COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 29, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 75.070 and 95.830(2) unconstitutionally made fire departments and firefighters immune because the Kentucky Constitution preserved the right to recover damages for negligence, and no fire department could be established as part of central state government or county government, but firefighters had qualified official immunity.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
McKee v. Commonwealth, NO. 2005-CA-002565-MR, COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 29, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: Denial of appellant's Ky. R. Crim. P. 11.42 post-conviction relief motion was proper because, inter alia, vague allegation that counsel did not investigate was not permitted, counsel's failure to investigate an alibi defense was strategic and not prejudicial, and there was no prejudice to appellant from being tried jointly with his codefendant.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Morrow v. Commonwealth, NO. 2005-CA-001645-MR, COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 29, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: Entrapment defense was unavailable in defendant's drug trafficking trial because defendant denied the underlying offense or any proscribed conduct. Complicity instruction given required the jury to find that defendant aided or assisted his brother in the drug transaction. There was no authority for a separate "mere presence" instruction.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Oldham Farms Dev., LLC v. Oldham County Planning & Zoning Comm'n, NO. 2006-CA-000079-MR, COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 29, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: Order affirming planning commission's denial of subdivision plan was proper because expert testimony alone constituted substantial evidence supporting the planning commission's findings that certain roads adjoining or adjacent to the proposed subdivision were inadequate to sustain the expected average daily traffic generated by 499 new homes.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Perkins v. Cabinet for Health & Family Servs., NO. 2005-CA-002287-MR, COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 29, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: Order affirming dismissal of employee's challenge to written employment reprimand was proper because exclusion of written reprimands from Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 18A.005(24) and creation of administrative remedy for disciplinary actions were determinative of legislative intent to foreclose appeal to board for those aggrieved by written reprimand.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Plattner v. Plattner, NO. 2005-CA-002525-MR, COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, June 29, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred by refusing to deviate from child support guidelines under Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 403.211(2), and awarding support to mother because parties were awarded joint custody with no primary residential custodian, physical custody was evenly divided between parties, and there was no significant disparity between parties' income.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.