 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Simmons v. Commonwealth, NO. 2004-CA-002527-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, August 17, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Kentucky Parole Board's reliance on 501 Ky. Admin. Regs. 1:030(3)(f) (2003), rather than on 501 Ky. Admin. Regs. 1:011 (1983), the latter of which was in effect at the time that an inmate committed his crimes, was not a violation of ex post facto, as the inmate's punishment was not enhanced or elongated by reliance on the newer rule.
|
|||||
| U.S. Bank, NA v. Hasty, NO. 2006-CA-000758-MR AND NO. 2006-CA-000740-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, August 17, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied a bank's motion under Ky. R. Civ. P. 60.02 to set aside a foreclosure judgment in order to add a judgment lienholder to the proceeding, as the filing of the lien after the commencement of the action but prior to the filing of the lis pendens allowed it to survive the foreclosure judgment.
|
|||||
| Vestal v. Motley, NO. 2005-CA-000956-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, August 17, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A correctional complex warden's memorandum, which clarified a policy regarding the retention of canteen receipts for perishable items, was a reasonable "housekeeping" measure which did not alter the policies collected under 501 Ky. Admin. Regs. 6:020 and did not violate Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13A.130.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
