 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mohammad v. Commonwealth, 2004-SC-0875-DG,
SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY, September 21, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a concealed weapon case, the phrase "glove compartment" in Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 527.020(8) plainly and unambiguously exempted only weapons stored inside a compartment in the dashboard on the passenger's side of a vehicle, commonly known as a glove compartment.
|
|||||
| O'Bryan v. Cave, 2005-SC-000118-DG & 2004-SC-000407-DG,
SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY, September 21, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a will beneficiary's legal malpractice suit against the attorney who drafted a will and a deed, the trial court properly granted summary judgment to the attorney. The beneficiary had produced no evidence, other than speculation, that the attorney had failed to advise the decedent that his wife could renounce her interest in the will.
|
|||||
| Rowan County v. Sloas, 2003-SC-000938-DG,
SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY, September 21, 2006, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment in favor of an inmate was reversed as a jailer and a deputy in their individual capacities since no allegations were made in the negligent supervision case that the deputy acted in bad faith while supervising a work crew thereby entitling the deputy to qualified official immunity.
|
|||||
| Schechter v. Ky. Bar Ass'n, 2005-SC-0507-KB,
SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY, September 21, 2006, Entered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an attorney possessed the requisite character, fitness, and moral qualifications for readmission to the practice of law in Kentucky, there were no impediments to the conditional restoration of the attorney to the practice of law pursuant to Ky. Sup. Ct. R. 3.510(3).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
