 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Perkins v. Commonwealth, NO. 2006-CA-000934-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, October 5, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was affirmed as motion to suppress was properly denied since defendant's 15- or 16-year-old son properly gave consent under Fourth Amendment to officers to enter home, son's consent was voluntary, and it was reasonable for officers to believe that son had apparent authority to consent to their entry.
|
|||||
| Powell v. Commonwealth, NO. 2006-CA-000522-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, October 5, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was affirmed as defendant's right to speedy trial under Sixth Amendment was not violated as 11-month delay between defendant's initial arrest and trial was not presumptively prejudicial given complexity of case, in which defendant and two codefendants were indicted for robbery and/or complicity to commit robbery of two victims.
|
|||||
| Shearer v. Commonwealth, NO. 2006-CA-001883-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, October 5, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress his confession to first-degree robbery, as he failed to show that he was coerced by the police in giving the same and failed to prove how his prior use of hallucinogenic drugs rendered him incapable of ever giving a voluntary statement to police.
|
|||||
| Wilkins v. Ky. Ret. Sys. Bd. of Trs., NO. 2006-CA-001626-MR,
COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY, October 5, 2007, Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's petition seeking review of the denial of his application for disability retirement was properly denied as untimely because, pursuant to Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13B.140(1), time period for filing was 30 days, and, contrary to employee's claim, Columbus Day, the final day of the period was not a legal holiday for time computation purposes.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
