 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Parfait v. Transocean Offshore, Inc., NO. 2004-CA-1271 C/W NO. 2005-CA-0174,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In Jones Act claim, 46 U.S.C.S. § 688, based on photographs and expert's testimony that employer failed to comply with its own safety policy to minimize any fall hazard and could have done so by installing handrail on vessel's platform, jury could have concluded that employer breached its duty of care to employee by not exercising reasonable care.
|
|||||
| State v. Roberts, 06-765,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, THIRD CIRCUIT, January 7, 2007, Opinion Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions for second-degree murder and attempted second-degree murder were appropriate under La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 14:30.1(A) and 14:27 because the testimony clearly showed that defendant pointed a pistol at the victims and then fired it, killing one of the victims and striking the other.
|
|||||
| Allen v. Valero Energy Corp., NO. 06-CA-726,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying an employee's exception of prematurity to his employer's reconventional demand and his appeal was dismissed because amended La. Code Civ. Proc. Ann. art. 2083 no longer permitted the appeal of an interlocutory judgment denying an exception of prematurity where an arbitration agreement had been alleged.
|
|||||
| Metro Rediscount Co. v. Base Distribs., NO. 06-CA-392,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
