 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Laurent v. Jolly-Wright, NO. 2005-CA-1499,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Following his car accident, the trial court's award of general damages against his uninsured motorist carrier was proper as the insured did not provide his treating physicians with complete and accurate information regarding his pre-existing medical problems and his subsequent and intervening accidents.
|
|||||
| State v. Bryant, NO. 2006-KA-1154,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an attempted possession of a firearm case, because the trial court was not required to personally inform defendant of his right to trial by jury under La. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 780, we defendant's assertion that he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a trial by jury lacked merit.
|
|||||
| State v. Dees, NO. 2006-KA-1198,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's ruling quashing the bill of information was reversed as the four months and one week from the filing of the original bill of information to the granting of the motion to quash was not sufficient to find a speedy trial violation under La. Const. art. I, § 16 considering the felony charges against defendant.
|
|||||
| State v. Dunbar, NO. 2006-KA-1030,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for the unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in violation of La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14:68.4 was inappropriate because the State presented no direct or compelling circumstantial evidence that the vehicle that defendant was driving belonged to the owner of the vehicle as charged in the bill of information.
|
|||||
| State v. Gray, No. 41,732-KA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported defendant's conviction of attempted simple kidnapping under La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 14:27(A) and 14:45(A)(1) because his refusal to stop his car when victim asked him to constituted forcible seizing and carrying of victim from one place to another; several of his actions indicated his intent to commit simple kidnapping.
|
|||||
| State v. Guice, NO. 2006-KA-1146,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in granting defendant's motion to quash the bill of information charging him with possession with intent to distribute cocaine as defendant failed to show that the eight-month delay was presumptively prejudicial and violated his right to a speedy trial under La. Const. art. I, § 16, and the delays were caused by defendant.
|
|||||
| State v. Mayeux, 06-944,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, THIRD CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Opinion Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to sustain a forcible rape conviction, La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14:42.1, because the victim testified she awoke to find defendant standing over her, he pinned her down with his legs, held her arms over her head, and with his other hand he pulled her pajama bottoms off and penetrated her with his penis.
|
|||||
| State v. Smith, NO. 2006-KA-1091,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was convicted of attempted possession of cocaine, the trial court's imposition of a three-year sentence was illegal under La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 40:979(A). The maximum prison sentence for the crime of attempted possession of cocaine was two and one-half years.
|
|||||
| Vincent v. Vincent, NO. 2005-CA-1175,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 10, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A district court did not err in awarding a wife interim spousal support and permanent alimony, although the appellate court concluded that the permanent alimony should have been limited to five years. The district court erred in assessing all attorney's fees to the husband, but not in assessing all court costs to him.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
