 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Aulston, NO. 05-B-1546,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, January 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In the office of disciplinary counsel's petition seeking permanent disbarment of a lawyer after he was suspended from practicing law in another state, the supreme court imposed a reciprocal discipline pursuant to La. Sup. Ct. R. XIX, § 21 as it found no extraordinary circumstances compelling a variance from the other state's sanction.
|
|||||
| In re Schnyder, NO. 05-B-1463,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, January 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended for a year and a day for violating La. St. Bar art. XVI, R. 1.3, 1.4, 3.2, and 8.1(c); he violated duties owed to his clients and as a professional, acted negligently and knowingly, causing significant harm to both clients, which could have been avoided, had prior disciplinary offenses, and did not cooperate in investigation.
|
|||||
| Lang v. Asten, Inc., No. 2005-C-1119,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, January 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In insured's civil suit against third-party insurers, the trial abused its discretion when it found the insurers guilty of constructive contempt of court as no rule to show cause stating the facts alleged to constitute the alleged contempt, as required by La. Code Civ. Proc. Ann. art. 225(A), was filed against the insurers.
|
|||||
| Nesbitt v. Nesbitt, No. 40,442-CA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court affirmed a trial court's determination that campaign debt incurred for a husband's political campaign during the marriage was a community obligation under La. Civ. Code Ann. art. 2360, but the appellate court remanded the matter for the trial judge to reconsider the allocation of the campaign debts owed by the campaign organization.
|
|||||
| State v. Moore, No. 40,311-KA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, January 13, 2006, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant sought to replace appointed counsel on first day of trial, or in alternative, to represent himself, the record showed the only warning the court did not specifically give defendant concerned maximum sentence exposure he faced. But discussion of rejected plea agreement showed he was aware of exposure. His waiver of counsel was valid.
|
|||||
| State v. Silva, No. 2005-KP-1344,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, January 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
