 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Duque, No. 42,074-KW,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, January 18, 2007, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred in finding defendant was a public officer or a public employee for purposes of malfeasance charge under La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14:134, as organization for which he worked was not a public agency; inter alia, parish police jury did not have authority to have declared organization a public agency pursuant to La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 23:64(E).
|
|||||
| State v. Roberts, NO. 06-KA-678,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIFTH CIRCUIT, January 18, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where a hearing set the amount of restitution owed by defendant at over $90,000 in a theft of currency and insurance fraud case, an appeal from this judgment was dismissed as untimely where it was filed more than 30 days after the hearing, pursuant to La. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 914.
|
|||||
| Palermo v. Port of New Orleans, NO. 2004-CA-1804 CONSOLIDATED WITH: NO. 2004-CA-1805,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 19, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred in finding ship repair companies and dock board liable for deaths of two individuals allegedly caused by occupational exposure to asbestos from their work on wharves in New Orleans; inter alia, board did not owe them a duty to provide them with safe work environment and had no legal duty to protect them from hazards posed by asbestos.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
