 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Tugler v. James Mach. Works, Inc., No. 41,704-WCA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, January 24, 2007, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation claimant's appeal from a decision by a WCJ dismissing claimant's petition for nullity of prior workers' compensation claim in instant occupational disease claim but expressly allowing occupational disease claim to continue was dismissed as WCJ's conclusion that 2002 settlement did not preclude instant action was interlocutory.
|
|||||
| Williams v. Exide Techs. , No. 36,354-WCA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, January 24, 2007, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation benefits were properly denied in a case based on a failure to meet the burden of proof where a claimant failed to properly report an alleged back injury to his job, and he failed to identify a specific incident that caused the injury when he gave a medical history to several doctors.
|
|||||
| Winston v. Winston, No. 41,766-CW,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, January 24, 2007, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A decision to hold a husband in contempt of court under La. Code Civ. Proc. Ann. art. 222(1) based on an allegation that he deliberately misstated and misrepresented facts during a hearing involving community property was vacated because it was improper to make a finding of perjury without affording the husband the protections of due process.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
