 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cannisnia Plantation, L.L.C. v. Am. Energy Holdings, L.L.C., No. 42,170-CA, No. 42,171-CA (Consolidated Cases),
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, January 25, 2007, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court abused its discretion in designating judgment as final and appealable and La. Code Civ. Proc. Ann. art. 1915(B) motion to dismiss appeal was granted; issue of effect of Executive Orders KBB-32, 48, and 67, on prescription of nonuse was intertwined with remaining issues whether appellants' operations were sufficient to interrupt prescription.
|
|||||
| Alex v. Rayne Concrete Serv., NOS. 2005-C-1457 C/W 2005-C-2344 C/W 2005-C-2520,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An intermediate appellate court was allowed to either review a Batson/Edmonson challenge in a civil case on supervisory writ application or on appeal as that practice was in line with the procedure utilized in criminal cases and was consistent with the practice regarding challenges for cause in civil cases and challenges in federal courts.
|
|||||
| In re Miller, No. 2006-O-2361,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judiciary Commission of Louisiana's charge that a district judge violated a consent order that prohibited him from contacting his secretary or her daughter was proven by clear and convincing evidence because the judge admitting to mailing child support checks to his secretary.
|
|||||
| In re Spradling, NO. 06-B-1971,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was permanently disbarred for, inter alia, conversion of client funds and his submission of false evidence in disciplinary proceeding; hearing committee was not convinced alcohol abuse was major contributor to attorney's misconduct and disciplinary board accepted that finding, noting he engaged in misconduct even after he stopped drinking.
|
|||||
| State v. Dick, NO. 06-KP-2223 c/w NO. 06-KK-2226,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, January 26, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 15:308C, defendants' exclusive remedy to reduce their mandatory sentences under La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 40:966B(1) for heroin charges was before the Louisiana Risk Review Panel. Reduction of their final sentences was a commutation, which could only be done by the executive branch under La. Const. art. IV, § 5(E).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
