 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Succession of Conville v. Bank One La., N.A., NO. 40,506-CA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment dismissing claims against a bank and its officer was affirmed because plaintiffs did not establish that there was a genuine issue of fact as to whether the bank officer influenced a decedent to change beneficiaries on his annuity contracts or whether the officer had a duty to send a copy of a power of attorney to the annuity companies.
|
|||||
| Thomas v. Duncan, No. 40,635-CA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Parents did not show statutory authority that would require or allow a private entity like a baseball club to install traffic control devices or signs on a public thoroughfare like the one where their son was injured; such conduct was prohibited by La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 32:236. No authority imposed general duty on club to employ crossing guards.
|
|||||
| Twin Branches Real Estate v. Hall, No. 40,615-CA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When two judgments involving same property were entered at two different times, in two separate states, creditors sought guidance about which judgment controlled the date from which interest began to accrue. Louisiana judgment controlled because it was recorded; it referred to judgment that was nearer in time, space, and thought.
|
|||||
| Williams v. Cooper, NO. 2005-CA-0654, CONSOLIDATED WITH: NO. 2005-CA-0655,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly dismissed a driver's negligence claims against the city under La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 9:2800 as the driver failed to establish that a malfunctioning traffic signal at the intersection where the car accident occurred was a cause-in-fact of the driver's injury.
|
|||||
| Wilson v. Invacare Corp., No. 40,507-CA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, January 25, 2006, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in finding hospital patient's injuries stemming from alleged collapse of shower transfer bench fell within scope of Medical Malpractice Act (MMA), La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 40:1299.41 et seq.; his claim hospital personnel could have and should have seen defect in transfer bench did not sound in medical malpractice but purely in tort.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
