 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bah v. Cont'l Cas. Ins. Co., NO. 2005-CA-0499,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a driver's suit after his car accident, summary judgment in favor of the other driver was proper as a genuine issue of material fact as to the other driver's duty under La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 32:123 did not exist where the driver testified that there was nothing obstructing his view onto the highway and an officer cited him for failure to yield.
|
|||||
| Egle v. Egle, 05-0531,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, THIRD CIRCUIT, February 8, 2006, Opinion Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the trial court failed to dispose of the corporation's motion for JNOV or remittitur and alternative motion for a new trial, the order of appeal was premature under La. Code Civ. Proc. Ann. art. 2087(D) and La. Code Civ. Proc. Ann. art. 2123(C), as the trial court had not been divested of jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| In re Green, NO. 2006-OB-0141,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, February 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Harris, NO. 2006-OB-0268,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, February 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Marks v. New Orleans Police Dep't, NO. 2005-CA-0307,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a police officer's action challenging the Civil Service Commission's upholding of the police department's termination of his employment, as the department failed to conclude the investigation within the 60 days, and failed to request a 60-day extension pursuant to La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 40:2531, the Commission's decision was reversed.
|
|||||
| Rapp v. Geico Indem. Co., NO. 2005-CA-0368,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an insured's suit against his insurer for injuries sustained when a pedestrian ran out in front of his motorcycle, the trial court properly granted the insurer's motion for partial summary judgment as the insurer provided sufficient evidence to prove that the policy was mailed as required by La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 22:628 and 22:634.
|
|||||
| Strother v. Cont'l Cas. Co., 05-1094,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, THIRD CIRCUIT, February 8, 2006, Opinion Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an insurer had not filed any bond, a motion to dismiss the suspensive appeal was not untimely if filed beyond the three day time period set forth in La. Code Civ. Proc. Ann. art. 2161; thus, the suspensive appeal had to be dismissed, but the appeal was maintained as devolutive.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
