|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Louisiana - February 22, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
In re Gaudet, No. 2005-B-1082,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was suspended for 6 months with 3 months deferred for making lewd comments to female hotel staff and saying that he was a judge when he was only a judicial candidate and for his conduct as an attorney regarding his representation of 2 clients; inter alia, he violated La. St. Bar art. XVI, R. 8.4(a), 8.4(c), 1.3, 1.4, 1.15(b), and 1.16(d).
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
La. Associated Gen. Contrs., Inc. v. La. Dep't of Agric. & Forestry, No. 2005-C-0131,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: State supreme court affirmed a ruling that the Louisiana Agriculture Finance Authority (LAFA) was exempt from the Public Bid Law, La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 38.2211 et seq., and was not limited to the creation of financing, such as the issuance of bonds, for use only by others under La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 3:262(C).
|
|
| |
|
| |
Parker v. Robinson, NO. 2005-CA-0160,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, February 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a driver's suit for injuries sustained in a car accident, as the driver's injuries were causally related to the accident, the injuries required medical attention, and the driver was still suffering from carpal tunnel syndrome that would require surgery in the future, the denial of a general damages award was an abuse of discretion.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|