LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Louisiana - March 21, 2007

  
Alexander v. Prestige Car Wash, NO. 2006-CA-0645, COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Order requiring the employee's attorney to pay $ 250 for failure to timely answer discovery was affirmed because the employee's attorney "necessitated the motion" to compel and thus should be required to pay the expenses associated with obtaining the order pursuant to La. Code Civ. Proc. Ann. art. 1469.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Bertrand v. Moore, 06-545 consolidated with 06-544, COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, THIRD CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Devall v. Starns, 2006 CA 2155, COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIRST CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: The incorporation of a city was enforceable because, even if a judgment, which rendered a prior judgment declaring a government plan's provision barring the incorporation unconstitutional, placed the provision back in effect, provision was unenforceable pursuant to La. Const. art. VI, § 2 as it was unconstitutional under La. Const. art. VI, § 8.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Dixie Servs., L.L.C. v. R & B Falcon Drilling USA, Inc., NO. 2005-CA-1212 CONSOLIDATED WITH: NO. 2006-CA-1209, COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Lessor had duty to mitigate its damages against lessee, La. Civ. Code Ann. art. 2002, as it knew lessee did not remain on property although actual written notice was untimely. Under La. Civ. Code Ann. art. 2045, lease was clear and lessee failed to submit written notice. Lessor was entitled to costs and fees, La. Code Civ. Proc. Ann. art. 2088.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Historic Restoration, Inc. v. RSUI Indem. Co., L.L.C., NO. 2006-CA-1178, COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Insurance company was entitled to a preliminary injunction enjoining the indemnity company from changing the terms and conditions of its existing insurance policy where given the multiplicity of possible losses, the insurance company would have been irreparably harmed if its property insurance was not renewed under the same terms and conditions.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Kuehn v. F.D.H. Dev., Inc., 07-64, COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, THIRD CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: From the denial of a resident's request for injunctive relief against a real estate developer, because La. Code Civ. Proc. Ann. art. 3612 established the resident's right to such an appeal, she was not required to undertake the additional procedures for an appeal of the partial judgment under La. Code Civ. Proc. Ann. art. 1915(B).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lawrence v. St. Augustine High Sch., NO. 2007-CA-0263, COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Inter alia, court erred in finding student's suspension by private high school violated due process; school provided and complied with all safeguards of procedural due process as outlined in student handbook and all persons involved were appraised of investigation, afforded opportunity to be heard, and school made a fair determination of penalties.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Marcotte v. Progressive Sec. Ins. Co., NO. 2006-CA-1368, COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Summary judgment was properly granted to an insurer in a dispute over UM/UIM coverage because an insured was unable to recover under the provisions of a policy covering a vehicle that was not involved in an accident, pursuant to La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 22:1406(D), where he had already received UM/UIM coverage for the vehicle involved.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Newman Marchive P'ship v. City of Shreveport, No. 42,073-CA, COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: A judgment creditor's petition for a writ of mandamus under La. Code Civ. Proc. Ann. arts. 3861, 3862, 3863 was denied because a city had the discretion of whether or not to appropriate money to satisfy the judgment, as required by La. Const. art. XII, § 10 and La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 13:5109.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rawboe Props., L.L.C. v. Dorsey, NO. 2006-CA-0070, COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Although attorney had committed malpractice because he had not filed suit against client's property insurer for supplemental claim within the appropriate time period, trial court did not err in declining to award damages and attorney fees as client did not successfully demonstrate any damages were incurred as a result of his attorney's malpractice.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.