 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Brown, NO. 2005-KA-1090,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to quash original bill of information happened exactly 10 months after it was filed. State nolle prosequied first bill of information seven months after it was filed. State did not dismiss first case in order to avoid time limitations of La. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 578. Thus, defendant's statutory right to a speedy trial was not violated.
|
|||||
| State v. Lewis, No. 40,802-KA, No. 40,803-KA (Consolidated Cases),
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Concurrent 19 year sentences at hard labor for convictions of aggravated incest, violation of La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14:78.1, and attempted manslaughter, violation of La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 14:31 and 27, after plea bargain, were not grossly disproportionate or shocking to appellate court's sense of justice and defendant greatly benefitted from plea.
|
|||||
| State v. Scroggins, No. 40,746-KA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In trial for armed robbery, sufficient evidence was introduced to support jury's finding that defendant was principal, pursuant to La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14:24, in armed robbery because, inter alia, there was nothing to indicate defendant was afraid of other men who raped, killed, and stole victim's truck, and he was not forced to accompany them.
|
|||||
| Tate v. Progressive Sec. Ins. Co., NO. 2005-CA-0393,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: From a car driver's personal injury suit against a truck driver, the company he was working for, and their insurers, summary judgment in favor of the company was improper as their were genuine issues of material fact as to whether the truck driver was an independent contractor.
|
|||||
| Williams v. Frank Parra Autoplex, Inc., 05-737,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, THIRD CIRCUIT, March 22, 2006, Opinion Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in dismissing defendants, car dealership and TV/VCP installer, from parents' wrongful death suit because although accident that killed their daughter occurred in Louisiana, parties were from Texas and defendants' informational web sites were not sufficient to support personal jurisdiction under Louisiana long-arm statute.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
