 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Emergency Physicians Ass'n v. Leventhal, NO. 2005 CA 1063 CONSOLIDATED WITH NO. 2005 CA 1064,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIRST CIRCUIT, March 24, 2006, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly held that an emergency physicians association was not entitled to non-pecuniary damages from a hospital in a breach of contract action because the contract between the parties was not meant to gratify some intellectual enjoyment, as defined by La. Civ. Code Ann. art. 1934(3); it was a business contract.
|
|||||
| Gayles v. Gayles, NO. 2005-C-2458,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Haydel v. State Farm Ins. Co., NUMBER 2005 CA 0701,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIRST CIRCUIT, March 24, 2006, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because, at very least, a question of fact existed as to amount of time a son lived at insured father's home, court erred in granting summary judgment to insurer based on finding the insured's son was not a resident-relative of his household and, thus, was not insured under terms of father's policy at the time son was killed in automobile accident.
|
|||||
| Head v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co., NO. 2005-C-2412,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Succession of Richardson, 2005 CA 0552,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIRST CIRCUIT, March 24, 2006, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly granted a motion by testator's children to reopen a succession and annul his will on the ground that the will was not valid as to form where the purported testament did not contain the attestation clause required by La. Civ. Code Ann. art. 1577. The substantial defect was fatal to the validity of the will.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. Mount Pilgrim Baptist Church, NO. 2005 CA 0337,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIRST CIRCUIT, March 24, 2006, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lachney v. Hanover Ins. Co., NO. 2005-C-2432,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Levy v. Tate & Lyle N. Am., NO. 2005-CC-2417,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Menge v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., NO. 2005-CC-2466,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, March 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
