 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Disaster Restoration Dry Cleaning, L.L.C. v. Pellerin Laundry Mach. Sales Co., No. 2005-CC-0715,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, April 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a contract dispute between a company and its supplier, a trial judge erred in ruling on the supplier's counsel's motion to enroll; once the judge determined that a ground for his recusal existed, he should have refrained from acting on the motion to enroll and referred the matter to another judge as per La. Code Civ. Proc. Ann. art. 154.
|
|||||
| Hudson v. City of Bossier City, No. 2005-C-0351 CONSOLIDATED WITH No. 2005-C-0352,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, April 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Decision finding that the casino revenue agreements were valid, except for one severable provision, was reinstated because the city never exercised the authority granted by La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 27:93 to levy an admission fee; thus, the parties were free to determine the distribution of the monies paid by the casinos in any manner they decided.
|
|||||
| In re Barrios, NO. 05-B-1932,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, April 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended for 2 years for violating, inter alia, La. St. Bar art. XVI, R. 1.3, 1.4, 1.5(f)(6), 1.9(a), 1.16(d), 3.2, and 8.4(g) and La. Sup. Ct. R. XIX, § 9(c), regarding 5 matters in which he, inter alia, engaged in a pattern of misconduct involving neglect of client matters and failed to account for and timely return unearned fees.
|
|||||
| In re Boellert, NO. 06-B-0482,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, April 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Jefferson, NO. 2005-O-1995,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, April 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Based on Judiciary Commission's recommendation, the court determined that petitioner was certified as eligible to seek judicial office pursuant to La. Sup. Ct. R. XXIII, § 26, where more than 5 years had elapsed since his removal from office, he had continually held a law license since 1980, and was in good standing as bar association member.
|
|||||
| In re Nalls, NO. 06-B-0257,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, April 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re an Offense Under Investigation, No. 06-KK-0270 c/w 06-KK-0271,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, April 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State ex rel. Jackson v. State, NO. 2005-KH-1951,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, April 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Davis, NO. 2005-K-2419,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, April 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
