|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Louisiana - May 9, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Jefferson v. Crowell, No. 42,177-CA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, May 9, 2007, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free
|
Overview: Denial of damages for an alleged tortious conversion of a vehicle was affirmed because the action had prescribed pursuant to the one-year prescriptive period under La. Civ. Code Ann. art. 3492, when plaintiffs had actual knowledge of the alleged conversion on April 30, 2004, and the lawsuit was not filed until June 23, 2005.
|
|
| |
Kuehn v. F.D.H. Dev., Inc., 07-64,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, THIRD CIRCUIT, May 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Appeal of trial court's ruling denying mandatory injunction would be waste of judicial resources; instead, appeal should await determination of the amount of money damages complainant was entitled to. Also, review of trial court's ruling denying exception of failure to join proper parties was inappropriate. Thus, appeal was dismissed as premature.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
McLaurin v. Clemons, No. 42,129-CA, No. 42,130-CA (Consolidated Cases),
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, May 9, 2007, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free
|
Overview: Regarding the division of property in a divorce, under La. Civ. Code Ann. arts. 2360, 2365, and 2369.3, the husband was entitled to reimbursement for the use of his separate property to pay mortgage payments and insurance premiums on a commercial building because the debt remained a community obligation since he prudently refinanced the loan.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|