 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Allen v. Brookshire Grocery Co., NO. 40,951-CA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, April 20, 2006, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although a $ 4,750 award of general damages for the hip injury of a minor who slipped and fell in a puddle at the grocery store was at the upper end of the range of appropriate awards, it did not exceed the highest amount reasonably within the trial court's broad discretion in assessing damages, and the award was thus affirmed.
|
|||||
| Hayes v. State Farm Ins. Co., No. 40,649-CA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, April 20, 2006, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In auto accident case, court erred in, inter alia, awarding all medical expenses plaintiff requested; portions of her medical treatment related to pre-existing conditions and a subsequent accident and as she suffered unique injuries in each of 3 collisions along with documented aggravations of pre-existing injuries, award was reduced by one third.
|
|||||
| In re Turissini, NO. 06-B-0172,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, April 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an attorney violated La. St. Bar art. XVI, R. 1.3, 1.4, 1.16(d), 8.1(c), and 8.4(g) by failing to take action on cases, failing to return files, and failing to cooperate with the investigation of complaints, disbarment was appropriate based on the aggravating factors, which included two prior suspensions for similar actions.
|
|||||
| State v. Delafosse, KA06-559,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, THIRD CIRCUIT, April 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Pennington, No. 2006-KK-0597,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, April 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Weary, No. 03-KA-3067,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, April 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to convict defendant of first degree murder, La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14:30, because 1) he had specific intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm on victim by releasing him in front of a speeding car; 2) he beat and kidnapped victim; and 3) he had specific intent to kill victim while engaged in perpetration of simple robbery.
|
|||||
| State v. Williams, No. 05-KK-1560,
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, April 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was charged with aggravated rape of a female under the age of 12 years, La. Code Evid. Ann. art. 412 barred any evidence that defendant's teenage son had a sexual relationship with the victim. Defendant could only present such evidence if the State elected to present the DNA tests results of the aborted fetus.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
