LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Louisiana - May 18, 2007

  
Bianchini v. DOT & Dev., No. 2007-CC-0522, SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, May 18, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Harris, NO. 06-OB-1761, SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, May 18, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Mosby, No. 42,519-KH, COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, May 18, 2007, Judgment rendered
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's conviction for issuing worthless check to business was upheld because on the intent to defraud question, evidence was sufficient to establish the rebuttable presumption provided for in La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14:71(A)(2); the day after the check was written, defendant's bank account balance was insufficient to cover the outstanding check.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Smallwood, No. 06-KP-2363, SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA, May 18, 2007, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial judge's statement that defendant's attorney would have the opportunity to cross-examine State's witnesses was sufficient to show that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation; thus, his guilty plea was voluntary, and the supreme court reinstated his plea and sentence, which appellate court had reversed.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.