 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Case, No. 42,095-KA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, May 23, 2007, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's sentence of 45 years at hard labor for armed robbery in violation of La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 14:64, 14:64.3 was affirmed because defendant received a significant benefit through a plea bargain that prevented the State form charging him as a habitual offender and he was on probation for prior felonies when he committed the robbery.
|
|||||
| State v. Henderson, No. 42,204-KA,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, SECOND CIRCUIT, May 23, 2007, Judgment Rendered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions and sentences for two counts of armed robbery in violation of La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 14:64, 64.3 were affirmed. Defendant planned the robbery of a restaurant and procured the gun, and defendant did nothing to stop an accomplice from robbing a customer. The 25-year sentences were not grossly disproportionate to the crimes.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. J.C. Penney, NO. 2006-CA-1520,
COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FOURTH CIRCUIT, May 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although claimant suffered a work-related injury, she did not carry her burden of proof as to entitlement to La. Rev. Stat. Ann. §. 23:1221(3)(a) SEBs and court erred in awarding them because claimant was released by her doctors to perform sedentary work on a full time basis and the employer in fact offered her 40 hours of sedentary work per week.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
